The Problem of an Intellectual History for Shakespeare's Age: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Summer 1989 | Summer 1989 | ||
This [[NEH_Summer_Institute_for_college_and_university_faculty|NEH Summer Institute for College and University Faculty]] was a group revaluation of development, stasis, and change in the relation of intellectual theory to practice in England from 1480 to 1642, as participants identified Renaissance philosophical, political, economic, and scientific theories and inferred ideology from English practice in commerce, politics, and literature. | |||
'''<u>Faculty</u>''' | '''<u>Faculty</u>''' | ||
Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
[[Hayden White]], University of California at Santa Cruz | [[Hayden White]], University of California at Santa Cruz | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
[[Category: 16th century]] | [[Category: 16th century]] | ||
[[Category: 17th century]] | [[Category: 17th century]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:26, 4 August 2017
Directed by Leeds Barroll
Summer 1989
This NEH Summer Institute for College and University Faculty was a group revaluation of development, stasis, and change in the relation of intellectual theory to practice in England from 1480 to 1642, as participants identified Renaissance philosophical, political, economic, and scientific theories and inferred ideology from English practice in commerce, politics, and literature.
Faculty
Natalie Zemon Davis, Princeton University
John Guy, University of Bristol
Margaret Jacob, New School for Social Research
Gordon J. Schochet, Rutgers University
Hayden White, University of California at Santa Cruz
For more past programming from the Folger Institute, please see the article Folger Institute scholarly programs archive.
Hosted by the Folger Shakespeare Library. For more information about current summer seminars, please visit the National Endowment for the Humanities website.