Difference between revisions of "To Richard Bagot, Langley L.a.190"

Line 1: Line 1:
L.a.190​<br>
 
 
How vncharytably the p''ar''​​son of chedall (good mr​ Bagott​) hathe byne​<br>
 
How vncharytably the p''ar''​​son of chedall (good mr​ Bagott​) hathe byne​<br>
 
dealte w''i''​th​all by hys froward neyghbours it seemes well known​<br>
 
dealte w''i''​th​all by hys froward neyghbours it seemes well known​<br>

Revision as of 12:04, 5 December 2016

How vncharytably the par​​son of chedall (good mr​ Bagott​) hathe byne​
dealte wi​th​all by hys froward neyghbours it seemes well known​
vnto so you, so that I need nott any further to enfurme you​
herein. butt do haertely entreat that as you have pytyed​
his wrongfull vexaci​on​es​ in motioinge his ould adversaryes​
to an agreement, wherevnto they have assented: so do I trust​
that you will beestowe your​ traveylls vnto bromley​ on fryday​
next to effect a frenshyp betwyxt them, yf otherwyse they​
can nott be agreed by their alredy chosen arbytratons, att​
which​ plase you shall have my company I doe my best herein.​
So (wi​th​ most harty comendaci​on​es​) I leave you to the almyghty.​


langley​ the xvth of Ianuary 1594​


Your​ very Loving frend​ assureddly to his pow[damaged]​​ Wylia​m​ Basset​​


if this par​​sonnes molestaci​on​es​ weare as thorowly knowne vnto you as it is vnto myselfe, I am per​​suaded you would very greatly pytye his case. So preyinge I mey be hartely comended vnto good mrs​ bagott​ your bedfellowe, once ageine doe beetake you to the grace of god././​