Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hybrid material"

(→‎Form Term: new section)
 
Line 23: Line 23:
 
"Make reciprocal related work added entries in 700 ǂa / ǂt or 730 fields, identified as Folger-specific relations by use of "ǂ5 DFo" on cataloging records for published works."
 
"Make reciprocal related work added entries in 700 ǂa / ǂt or 730 fields, identified as Folger-specific relations by use of "ǂ5 DFo" on cataloging records for published works."
 
:I don't think this is necessary, since the wording in the note and the call number will both collocate hybrid works. Let's discuss when it comes up again. --Deborah J. Leslie 14:28, 19 March 2014 (EDT)
 
:I don't think this is necessary, since the wording in the note and the call number will both collocate hybrid works. Let's discuss when it comes up again. --Deborah J. Leslie 14:28, 19 March 2014 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Form Term ==
 +
 +
At lunch today, Heather mentioned the desirability of a form term to collocate hybrid material.  -- Deborah J. Leslie 14:13, 31 March 2014 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 13:13, 31 March 2014

HBCN

Moderate

  • Use of 773 needs resolution
  • Review and integrate Integrated media, which had separate existence in Bard
  • Decide term: aspect, format, media, something else?

--Deborah J. Leslie 14:36, 19 March 2014 (EDT)

Origin of page

http://bard.folger.edu/cgi-bin/view.pl/Main/CentralLibrary/HybridCataloging --Deborah J. Leslie 17:36, 18 March 2014 (EDT)

And http://bard.folger.edu/cgi-bin/view.pl/Main/CentralLibrary/GeneralCataloging#Integrated_media --Deborah J. Leslie 14:40, 19 March 2014 (EDT)

Cataloger notes and queries

Moved from original Bard page

  • Add an example of a non-interleaved mss item
  • For Sammelbands, adding the shelfmark of the other work is overkill, since the note will indicate the location within the volume, and the shelfmarks will differ only by a decimal point or "item x". Plus, if we do not require it here, the contents of such notes will be consistent with printed book bound-withs. ***AEB: Totally right, shelfmark here would be overkill I think I was thinking in terms of STC and Wing numbers for items that have MSS shelfmarks. So reword to: "and STC or Wing numbers if appropriate"?
  • Make a host item added entry (773) for the work in the other aspect if the relationship is unequal (e.g., single item being cataloged is tipped into a volume containing a larger work). Include ǂ5 DFo if the work you are cataloging is published. DJL: This is problematic for published material; ǂ5 is not defined for field 773 and is not intended to be used for copy-specific added entries. Since the shelfmarks will be different, can we dispense with the 773, relying on the note and distinct shelfmarks? or use a regular associated work added entry? ***EB: Uh oh. I must have missed something. We used 773 to indicate where extra-illustrations can be found, in the Garrick project, see for example http://shakespeare.folger.edu/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=127083. Didn't the Morgan find a way to create hot-links between extra-illustrations and the books they're in?

Reciprocal access points

From Bard "Make reciprocal related work added entries in 700 ǂa / ǂt or 730 fields, identified as Folger-specific relations by use of "ǂ5 DFo" on cataloging records for published works."

I don't think this is necessary, since the wording in the note and the call number will both collocate hybrid works. Let's discuss when it comes up again. --Deborah J. Leslie 14:28, 19 March 2014 (EDT)

Form Term

At lunch today, Heather mentioned the desirability of a form term to collocate hybrid material. -- Deborah J. Leslie 14:13, 31 March 2014 (EDT)