Miss Orlebar copy of the Pavier quartos

Revision as of 21:26, 2 March 2017 by ErinBlake (talk | contribs) (Added later order of binding and Giles Dawson's note)

The Miss Orlebar copy of the Pavier quartos no longer exists as an intact volume. It hasn't been intact since some time before May 8, 1763, when Thomas Percy (1729-1811) recorded that King Lear had been removed. Two other plays had also been removed by that time: The Yorkshire Tragedy and Thomas Heywood's A Woman Killed with Kindness. The remaining plays were re-bound together in the 19th century, then separated and rebound individually at the Folger in 1963.

Original order of binding

Presumably, the original order of binding matched the order in the manuscript table of contents on the verso of the front flyleaf:

  1. A Woman Killed with Kindness (current location unknown)
  2. Henry V (now Folger STC 22291 copy 7)
  3. Henry VI, Part 2, as the first part of The Whole Contention Between the Two Famous Houses, Lancaster and York...Divided into Two Parts (now the first part of Folger STC 26101 copy 2)
  4. Henry VI, Part 3, as the second part of The Whole Contention Between the Two Famous Houses, Lancaster and York...Divided into Two Parts (now the second part of Folger STC 26101 copy 2)
  5. The Merchant of Venice (now Folger STC 22303 copy 6)
  6. King Lear (current location unknown)
  7. A Midsummer Night's Dream (now Folger STC 22303 copy 6)
  8. The Merry Wives of Windsor (now Folger STC 22300 copy 7)
  9. Sir John Oldcastle (now Folger STC 18796 copy 3)
  10. A Yorkshire Tragedy (current location unknown)
  11. Pericles (now the third part of Folger STC 26101 copy 2)

Order of binding circs 1850 to 1963

The eight plays remaining in the collection after A Woman Killed with Kindness, King Lear, and A Yorkshire Tragedy had been removed were re-bound around 1850, based on a description of the binding by Folger staff member Giles Dawson in 1963. Their order was:

  1. Henry VI, Part 2, as the first part of The Whole Contention Between the Two Famous Houses, Lancaster and York...Divided into Two Parts (now the first part of Folger STC 26101 copy 2)
  2. Henry VI, Part 3, as the second part of The Whole Contention Between the Two Famous Houses, Lancaster and York...Divided into Two Parts (now the second part of Folger STC 26101 copy 2)
  3. Pericles (now the third part of Folger STC 26101 copy 2)
  4. The Merchant of Venice (now Folger STC 22303 copy 6)
  5. The Merry Wives of Windsor (now Folger STC 22300 copy 7)
  6. A Midsummer Night's Dream (now Folger STC 22303 copy 6)
  7. Henry V (now Folger STC 22291 copy 7)
  8. Sir John Oldcastle (now Folger STC 18796 copy 3)

Disbinding in 1963

A typed note bound at the end of Folger STC 26101 copy 2 (The Whole Contention and Pericles) signed and dated G.E. Dawson, 24 September 1963, describes the disbinding as follows:

These three plays were, when H.C. Folger acquired them, bound together with Merchant (22298), M. Wives (22300), Midsummer (22303), Henry V, (22291), and Oldcastle (18796), all being Pavier quartos of 1619. These eight, together with three others, were once in a volume which belonged to Bishop Percy, whose note on the recto of the old fly-leaf gives a partial history of the volume. King Lear is there accounted for; what happened to the Woman Killed and the Yorkshire Tragedy is not clear, but since the list of plays removed (unlike the long list on the verso) is in Percy's hand, they were presumably in the volume that Miss Orlebars gave away. After the volume was broken up Percy may have kept the eight plays unbound. At any rate the binding which the Folger binder [that is, Robert Lunow] removed (calf with blind decorations) appeared to have been done about 1850. Therefore the order of the plays in the last binding could not have been significant, and I have ignored it. For that matter, the presence of the non-Pavier Woman Killed pretty well guarantees that the original collector had no special plan in view and therefore that the arrangement in Miss Orlebars's volume was hit or miss. It may safely be assumed that the original order is shown in the list on the verso of the old fly-leaf.
The 1850 binding was perfectly sound and satisfactory. The decision to break it up arose from the extreme tenderness of many of the leaves caused by the use of the volume, at some time after 1850, for the pressing of botanical specimens and the resulting mildew.
For the Earl of Caledon's possession of the volume, see an article by Van Lennep in the 1964 Shakespeare Quarterly anniversary volume.

A collation provided by Dawson follows, along with a note that "the other five plays will be found in bindings roughly uniform with this one." The other volumes have a much shorter note, referring the reader to this one for additional information.