Talk:MARC 506 Restrictions on Access Note: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 17:49, 20 May 2016

Origin of page

http://bard.folger.edu/cgi-bin/view.pl/Main/CentralLibrary/GeneralCataloging#Restricted_notes --Deborah J. Leslie (talk) 19:02, 6 May 2014 (EDT)

Nonpublic note

Since we're now adding the reason for the restriction to the flags, it makes sense to add that information to the field. However, |x is not defined for 506. I could add it in Hamnet, however. Shall we use? --Deborah J. Leslie (talk) 12:07, 6 October 2014 (EDT)

Decision: changed note from MARC-view only to public based on discussion with curators (sticking point had been that pointing out something is the only known copy seemed like a security risk, but those fears were allayed because we already have lots of things that are obviously the only known copy -- manuscripts, for example -- and that isn't seen as a problem). --Erin Blake (talk) 17:24, 20 May 2016 (EST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Origin of page ==
 http://bard.folger.edu/cgi-bin/view.pl/Main/CentralLibrary/GeneralCataloging#Restricted_notes --[[User:DeborahLeslie|Deborah J. Leslie]] ([[User talk:DeborahLeslie|talk]]) 19:02, 6 May 2014 (EDT)
+== Nonpublic note ==
+Since we're now adding the reason for the restriction to the flags, it makes sense to add that information to the field. However, |x is not defined for 506. I could add it in Hamnet, however. Shall we use? --[[User:DeborahLeslie|Deborah J. Leslie]] ([[User talk:DeborahLeslie|talk]]) 12:07, 6 October 2014 (EDT)
+: Decision: changed note from MARC-view only to public  based on discussion with curators (sticking point had been that pointing out something is the only known copy seemed like a security risk, but those fears were allayed because we already have lots of things that are obviously the only known copy -- manuscripts, for example -- and that isn't seen as a problem). --[[User:ErinBlake|Erin Blake]] ([[User talk:ErinBlake|talk]]) 17:24, 20 May 2016 (EST)