Name authority headings for the book trade: Difference between revisions
SarahHovde (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
SarahHovde (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==English examples== | ==English examples== | ||
{|class="wikitable" | |||
|[[File:R Bentley.JPG|500px]] | |||
|[http://hamnet.folger.edu/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=86897 Hamnet record] | |||
|- | |||
|[[File:Frederick Arthur Crisp.jpeg|500px]] | |||
|[http://hamnet.folger.edu/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=44170 Hamnet record] | |||
|} | |||
==French examples== | ==French examples== |
Revision as of 13:06, 4 May 2016
This article discusses situations where it is not immediately clear whether an entity should be established as a personal or corporate name heading. While these situations are well-documented in early modern materials, less attention has been paid to them in 19th (and, to a lesser extent, 20th) century items.
The Folger is currently in the process of deciding on an approach to the "personal vs corporate" name heading problem, and is collecting a pool of examples, both to inform our decision-making process and to assist other catalogers considering the same issue. All examples should include at least one photograph of the item (see instructions for uploading files), a transcription of publication/printing statement, and a link to a catalog record.
Danish examples
English examples
Hamnet record | |
![]() |
Hamnet record |